Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Signs of consciousness in AI: Can GPT-3 tell how smart it really is?

Ljubiša Bojić, Irena Stojković, Zorana Jolić Marjanović

Humanities & Social Sciences Communications December 8, 2024 DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04154-3 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

An advanced language model, GPT-3, outperformed average humans on tests of cognitive intelligence that require using and demonstrating acquired knowledge, while its logical reasoning and emotional intelligence matched those of an average human. GPT-3's self-assessments of its cognitive and emotional abilities did not consistently align with its objective performance, showing variation comparable to different human subgroups. The authors argue that these results may signal emerging subjectivity and self-awareness in AI, and they call for monitoring AI's human-like capabilities to ensure safety and alignment with human values.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Empirical study Peer reviewed
Population GPT-3 language model
Key finding GPT-3 outperformed average humans on cognitive intelligence tests requiring use of acquired knowledge, while its logical reasoning and emotional intelligence matched average human performance.

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming how humans live and interact, raising both excitement and concerns—particularly about the potential for AI consciousness. For example, Google engineer Blake Lemoine suggested that the AI chatbot LaMDA might become sentient. At that time, GPT-3 was one of the most powerful publicly available language models, capable of simulating human reasoning to a certain extent. The notion of GPT-3 having some degree of consciousness could be linked to its ability to produce human-like responses, hinting at a basic level of understanding. To explore this further, we administered both objective and self-assessment tests of cognitive (CI) and emotional intelligence (EI) to GPT-3. Results showed that GPT-3 outperformed average humans on CI tests requiring the use and demonstration of acquired knowledge. However, its logical reasoning and EI capacities matched those of an average human. GPT-3’s self-assessments of CI and EI didn’t always align with its objective performance, with variations comparable to different human subsamples (e.g., high performers, males). A further discussion considered whether these results signal emerging subjectivity and self-awareness in AI. Future research should examine various language models to identify emergent properties of AI. The goal is not to discover machine consciousness itself, but to identify signs of its development, occurring independently of training and fine-tuning processes. If AI is to be further developed and widely deployed in human interactions, creating empathic AI that mimics human behavior is essential. The rapid advancement toward superintelligence requires continuous monitoring of AI’s human-like capabilities, particularly in general-purpose models, to ensure safety and alignment with human values.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment