Noetic Genesis: Process Ontology and the Geometric Foundations of Stable Otherness
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) June 3, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20517860 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Unification Ontology Process computing Perspective graphical Bridge graph theory Process philosophy Hegelianism Object grammar Artificial intelligence Relational database Relational view Relational model Epistemology Differential mechanical device |
| Key points | Proposes that 'Stable Otherness' can be understood as a dynamic relational structure across biological, cognitive, and artificial systems, formalized through geometric analogies and a three-phase CDU cycle. |
Abstract
This paper proposes a process-ontological framework for understanding "Stable Otherness"—the dynamic relational structure that enables a meaningful encounter between self and other—across biological, cognitive, and artificial systems. Drawing on Whitehead’s process philosophy and enactivism, we introduce geometric analogies—specifically relational manifolds, connections (∇), and geometric flows—to formalize the dynamic structure of relationality. We define an irreversible three-phase process of Construction, Dissipation, and Unification (the CDU cycle) and reinterpret Hegelian Aufheben as "Covariant Aufheben"—the dynamic alignment of interpretive horizons. This framework illuminates the natural-historical continuity from pre-biotic systems to flowering plants, animals, humans, and AI, while offering a novel perspective on AI alignment as a co-evolutionary geometric alignment on a shared relational manifold. While primarily philosophical in scope, the paper employs structural analogies intended to bridge process ontology with potential future formalizations in differential geometry and non-equilibrium physics.