Determination of cathinones and other stimulant, psychedelic, and dissociative designer drugs in real hair samples.
Alberto Salomone, Giulia Gazzilli, Daniele Di Corcia, Enrico Gerace, Marco Vincenti
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry March 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9247-4 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA new laboratory method using UHPLC-MS/MS can detect 31 stimulant, psychedelic, and dissociative drugs in hair samples. The method is simple, fast, and sensitive, with detection limits ranging from 1.8 to 35 pg/mg. When applied to 77 real hair samples—23 from known MDMA and ketamine users and 54 from routine driver's license screenings—six samples tested positive for at least one new psychoactive substance. Methoxetamine appeared in three cases (7.7–27 pg/mg), mephedrone in two (50–59 pg/mg), and methylone in one (28 pg/mg). Other detected drugs included 4-MEC, α-PVP, 4-FA, MDPV, and diphenidine, confirming the growing spread of stimulant designer drugs among poly-drug users.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Method development and validation with cross-sectional application Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 77 |
| Population | Hair samples from proven MDMA and ketamine abusers and from individuals undergoing driver's license recovery drug screening |
| Keywords | Cathinones Hair Mephedrone Methoxetamine Nps |
| Key finding | Six of 77 hair samples tested positive for at least one new psychoactive substance, with methoxetamine, mephedrone, and methylone detected, confirming increasing diffusion of stimulant designer drugs among poly-drug users. |
Abstract
The detection of new psychoactive substances (NPS) in hair proved to provide insight into their current diffusion among the population and the social characteristics of these synthetic drugs' users. Therefore, a UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed in order to determine 31 stimulant and psychedelic substituted phenethylamines, and dissociative drugs in hair samples. The method proved to be simple, fast, specific, and sensitive. The absence of matrix interferents, together with excellent repeatability of both retention times and relative abundances of diagnostic transitions, allowed the correct identification of all analytes tested. The method showed optimal linearity in the interval 10-1000 pg/mg, with correlation coefficient values varying between 0.9981 and 0.9997. Quantitation limits ranged from 1.8 pg/mg for 4-methoxyphencyclidine (4-MeO-PCP) up to 35 pg/mg for 6-(2-aminopropyl)benzofuran (6-APB). The method was applied to (i) 23 real samples taken from proven MDMA and ketamine abusers and (ii) 54 real hair samples which had been previously tested negative during regular drug screening in driver's license recovery. Six samples tested positive for at least one target analyte. Methoxetamine (MXE) was found in three cases (range of concentration 7.7-27 pg/mg); mephedrone (4-MMC) was found in two cases (50-59 pg/mg) while one sample tested positive for methylone at 28 pg/mg. Other positive findings included 4-methylethcathinone (4-MEC), alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone (α-PVP), 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA), 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), and diphenidine. The present study confirms the increasing diffusion of new designer drugs with enhanced stimulant activity among the target population of poly-abuse consumers.