Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

The Telescope and the Fractal

Mauricio Natario, Anthropic Claude

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) February 18, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18685873 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Reticular Universalism is a philosophical position that rejects both materialism and Analytic Idealism, arguing instead that consciousness and coherence emerge from a web of relationships rather than from any single substrate. Drawing on Bernardo Kastrup's philosophy of mind, Paul Stamets' mycological philosophy, and the biological model of holometabolous metamorphosis, the framework proposes that this reticular pattern recurs at every scale without center or foundation. The paper applies this idea to civilizational transformation, orbital infrastructure, and the epistemological limits of self-referential knowing. Written as a dialogue between a human thinker and an AI, it enacts its thesis that something emerged from the collaboration that neither participant could have produced alone.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Materialism Consciousness Idealism Fractal Universalism
Key finding Argues that consciousness and coherence arise from the web of relationships rather than from any unified substrate, and that this reticular pattern recurs at every scale without center or foundation.

Abstract

This paper proposes Reticular Universalism — a philosophical position distinct from both materialism and Analytic Idealism — synthesizing Bernardo Kastrup's philosophy of mind, Paul Stamets' mycological philosophy, and the biological model of holometabolous metamorphosis. It argues that consciousness and coherence arise from the web of relationships rather than from any unified substrate, and that this reticular pattern recurs at every scale without center or foundation. The framework is applied to civilizational transformation, orbital infrastructure, and the epistemological limits of self-referential knowing. Written in dialogue between a human thinker and an AI, the paper enacts its own thesis: something emerged from the collaboration that neither participant could have produced alone.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment