Skip to content

Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data

Michel Nijs, Ewa Wajs, Leah Aluisio, Ibrahim Turkoz, Ella Daly, Adam Janik, Stephane Borentain, Jaskaran Singh, Allitia DiBernardo, Frank Wiegand

The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology April 7, 2020 DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa027 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term study Peer reviewed
Sample size 778
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression
Interventions Esketamine nasal spray oral antidepressant
Duration Up to 1 year
Topics Esketamine
Keywords Phase matter
Citations 21
Registration NCT02497287
Key points Adjusting esketamine treatment frequency based on symptom response can help maintain or improve clinical outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

Background: Esketamine nasal spray was recently approved for treatment-resistant depression. The current analysis evaluated the impact of symptom-based treatment frequency changes during esketamine treatment on clinical outcomes.

Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of an open-label, long-term (up to 1 year) study of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN 2). During a 4-week induction phase, 778 patients self-administered esketamine twice weekly plus a new oral antidepressant daily. In responders (≥50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score from baseline), esketamine treatment frequency was thereafter decreased during an optimization/maintenance phase to weekly for 4 weeks and then adjusted to the lowest frequency (weekly or every other week) that maintained remission (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ≤ 12) based on a study-defined algorithm. The relationship between treatment frequency and symptom response, based on clinically meaningful change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, was subsequently evaluated 4 weeks after treatment frequency adjustments in the optimization/maintenance phase.

Results: Among 580 responders treated with weekly esketamine for the first 4 weeks in the optimization/maintenance phase (per protocol), 26% continued to improve, 50% maintained clinical benefit, and 24% worsened. Thereafter, when treatment frequency could be reduced from weekly to every other week, 19% further improved, 49% maintained benefit, and 32% worsened. For patients no longer in remission after treatment frequency reduction, an increase (every other week to weekly) resulted in 47% improved, 43% remained unchanged, and 10% worsened.

Conclusions: These findings support individualization of esketamine nasal spray treatment frequency to optimize treatment response in real-world clinical practice.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287.

Comparable studies

Other non-randomized and open-label trials on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults (≥ 18 years) with treatment-resistant depression 2020 Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term study n = 802
Long-Term Safety and Maintenance of Response With Esketamine Nasal Spray in Participants With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Interim Results of the SUSTAIN-3 Study Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Open-label, long-term extension study n = 1,148
Safety and efficacy with esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: long-term extension study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression who participated in ≥1 of 6 phase 3 parent... 2025 Open-label, single-arm long-term extension study n = 1,148
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Comorbid Chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Open-Label Single-Arm Pilot Study Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and comorbid post-traumatic... 2022 Open-label, single-arm, retrospective pilot study n = 11
Acute effects of esketamine on hypoxic ventilatory response, haemodynamics, and brain function in healthy volunteers. Healthy subjects 2025 Open-label study n = 18

Citations in the library

Cited by 11

and 6 more in the library

Cites 5

Explore topics