What Can Space-time Emergence Teach Us About Consciousness?
Journal of Consciousness Studies February 1, 2026 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.33.1.160 (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA critique of Schneider and Bailey's 'Superpsychism' argues that their prototime interpretation of quantum mechanics, which places entanglement in a non-spatio-temporal arena and locates maximal consciousness at that fundamental level, faces two problems. First, if the fundamental level lacks space and time, the concept of the physical becomes unstable, reducing to a thin negative gap that reflects ignorance rather than a principled contrast. Second, the distinction between superpsychism and cosmopsychism cannot rely on scale without space-time; recast in mereological terms, superpsychism shows no clear advantage and risks collapsing into cosmopsychism. The prototime framework points toward non-spatio-temporal monism, leaving open whether superpsychism is preferable within monist views.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that superpsychism faces two issues: it makes the concept of the physical unstable, and it cannot be clearly distinguished from cosmopsychism once space-time is set aside. |
Abstract
Schneider and Bailey's 'Superpsychism' advances the prototime interpretation of quantum mechanics, on which entanglement unfolds in a non-spatio-temporal arena. By locating maximal consciousness at this fundamental level, they aim to gain leverage over both physicalism and cosmopsychism. I argue, however, that the view encounters two issues. First, if the fundamental level is nonspatio-temporal, our conception of the physical becomes unstable. At best one could redescribe what remains as a thin negative gap, but even that residual puzzle carries little dialectical force, reflecting ignorance rather than any principled contrast. Second, the contrast between superpsychism and cosmopsychism cannot rely on scale once space-time is set aside; recast mereologically, it shows no clear advantage for superpsychism, and in fact risks collapsing into cosmopsychism unless further argument is supplied. The broader lesson is that the prototime framework points more generally, and at least prima facie, toward non-spatio-temporal monism, while leaving open the task of showing whether and why superpsychism should be preferred within the family of monist views.