Skip to content

Adverse Effects and Safety of Antidepressants and Psychedelics for Depression in Cancer: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Renan Massanobu Maekawa, Lorena T. L. Guerra, José Carlos Bouso, J. Hallak, Rafael G. Dos Santos

Psychoactives March 4, 2025 DOI: 10.3390/psychoactives4010006 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Peer reviewed
Population Cancer patients with depressive symptoms
Topics Depression
Key findings Serious adverse events from antidepressants were reported in only two studies, indicating an acceptable safety profile, but small sample sizes underscore the need for larger placebo-controlled trials.

Abstract

Depression is common among patients suffering from cancer, but is often challenging to diagnose due to the overlap of symptoms with cancer and its treatments. Additionally, treating depression in cancer patients is challenging because of the confusion between the adverse effects of antidepressants, cancer treatments, and cancer symptoms. This study aims to evaluate the safety and adverse effects of pharmacological interventions, focusing on antidepressants and psychedelics, in the treatment of depression in cancer patients. The review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and includes studies published up to July 2024. We searched PubMed, Scielo, and Lilacs databases, and included randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trials involving cancer patients with depressive symptoms. A total of 1764 articles were identified, with 21 randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies involved cancer patients with depressive symptoms, and only one study included patients with other life-threatening conditions. Serious adverse events related to antidepressant treatment were reported in only two studies, indicating an acceptable safety profile. Most other adverse effects were mild to moderate, and generally well-tolerated. Serious adverse events were infrequent; however, the small sample sizes underscore the necessity of larger, placebo-controlled trials assessing the safety of antidepressants and psychedelics in cancer patients.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Explore topics