Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

When words and pictures come alive: Relating the modality of intrusive thoughts to modalities of hypnagogic/hypnopompic hallucinations

S. McCarthy-Jones, Laura Barnes, G. Hill, L. Marwood, P. Moseley, C. Fernyhough

October 1, 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.003 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Hallucinations that occur when falling asleep (hypnagogic) or waking up (hypnopompic) are linked to intrusive thoughts. In a student sample, auditory hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations were predicted only by intrusive auditory imagery, while felt-presence experiences were predicted only by intrusive visual imagery. These relationships held after controlling for age, gender, depression, anxiety, and thought suppression. The Durham Hypnagogic and Hypnopompic Hallucinations Questionnaire showed good reliability for its auditory and felt-presence subscales but not for the visual subscale.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort
Sample size 299
Population Students
Keywords Psychology
Key finding Auditory hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations were predicted solely by intrusive auditory imagery, and felt-presence experiences were predicted solely by intrusive visual imagery.

Abstract

Hypnagogic and hypnopompic (H&H) hallucinations are those experienced on the borders of sleep and waking. Intrusive thoughts have been proposed to relate to the occurrence of such experiences. In a sample of students (N = 299), the present study investigated the relation between auditory and felt-presence H&H experiences, and specific modalities of intrusive thought (auditory and visual) whilst controlling for age, gender, depression, anxiety and thought suppression. The psychometric properties of the Durham Hypnagogic and Hypnopompic Hallucinations Questionnaire (DHQ) were also examined. Exploratory (N = 299) and, in a second sample, confirmatory (N = 502) factor analyses showed good internal and test–retest reliability for the auditory and felt-presence subscales of the DHQ, but not for the visual subscale. Regression analyses indicated that the sole predictor of auditory H&H hallucinations was intrusive auditory imagery, and the sole predictor of felt-presence H&H experiences was intrusive visual imagery. Explanations for these findings are considered and implications for future research are discussed.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment