Skip to content

Comparative meta-analysis of prazosin and imagery rehearsal therapy for nightmare frequency, sleep quality, and posttraumatic stress.

Gilbert Seda, Maria M Sanchez-Ortuno, Carolyn H Welsh, Ann C Halbower, Jack D Edinger

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine January 15, 2015 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.4354 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Interventions Prazosin Imagery rehearsal therapy
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Cognitive behavior therapy Imagery rehearsal therapy Insomnia Nightmares Posttraumatic stress disorder Prazosin
Key findings Prazosin and imagery rehearsal therapy produce comparable acute effects for nightmares, but adding cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia to IRT enhances sleep quality and posttraumatic stress symptoms more than prazosin or IRT alone.

Abstract

In this meta-analysis, we compare the short-term efficacy of prazosin vs. IRT on nightmares, sleep quality, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). Reference databases were searched for randomized controlled trials using IRT or prazosin for nightmares, sleep disturbance, and/or PTSS. Effect sizes were calculated by subtracting the mean posttest score in the control group from the mean posttest score in the treatment group, and dividing the result by the pooled standard deviation of both groups. Mixed effects models were performed to evaluate effects of treatment characteristics, as well as sample characteristics (veteran vs. civilian) on treatment efficacy. Four studies used prazosin, 10 used IRT alone or in combination with another psychological treatment, and 1 included a group receiving prazosin and another group receiving IRT. Overall effect sizes of both treatments were of moderate magnitude for nightmare frequency, sleep quality, and PTSS (p < 0.01). Effect size was not significantly different with type of treatment (psychological vs. pharmacological) on nightmare frequency (p = 0.79), sleep quality (p = 0.65), or PTSS, (p = 0.52). IRT combined with CBT for insomnia showed more improvement in sleep quality compared to prazosin (p = 0.03), IRT alone (p = 0.03), or IRT combined with another psychological intervention, (p < 0.01). Although IRT interventions and prazosin yield comparable acute effects for the treatment of nightmares, adding CBT for insomnia to IRT seems to enhance treatment outcomes pertaining to sleep quality and PTSS. More randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are warranted. A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 9.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. 2013 Systematic review with meta-analytic comparison
Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research 2016 Meta-analysis
The effectiveness of lucid dreaming therapy in patients with nightmares: A systematic review. Adults with chronic and recurring nightmares 2023 Systematic review
The relationships between insomnia, nightmares, and dreams: A systematic review Individuals without a concomitant psychopathology, including those with insomnia or... 2024 Systematic review
Psychosocial treatments for nightmares in adults and children: a systematic review 2023 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 21

and 16 more in the library

Cites 11

and 6 more in the library

Explore topics