Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Self-efficacy as a Mechanism of Action of Imagery Rehearsal Therapy's Effectiveness: An Exploratory Mediation Analysis.

Andréanne Rousseau, Mylène Dubé-Frenette, Geneviève Belleville

The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease October 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000862 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) increases self-efficacy about dreams and nightmares in victims of sexual assault with recurring nightmares, but this increase does not explain the therapy's effectiveness on insomnia and sleep quality. Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to IRT or a control condition. IRT predicted greater self-efficacy about dreams, which in turn predicted improvement in insomnia, and greater self-efficacy about nightmares predicted better sleep quality. However, self-efficacy was not a significant mediator of IRT's effects on these outcomes, suggesting it may not be a primary mechanism of action.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 35
Population Victims of sexual assault with recurring nightmares
Intervention Imagery rehearsal therapy
Key finding Self-efficacy about dreams and nightmares did not significantly mediate IRT's effectiveness on insomnia and sleep quality.

Abstract

Imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT) is an empirically validated therapy targeting recurring nightmares, for which the mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to investigate how an exploratory measure of self-efficacy could mediate IRT's effectiveness. Thirty-five victims of sexual assault with recurring nightmares were randomly assigned to either IRT or a control condition. Participants completed questionnaires about self-efficacy and nocturnal symptoms at pre- and posttreatment. Regression analyses showed that IRT predicted greater self-efficacy about dreams (β = .578) and that self-efficacy about dreams predicted improvement in insomnia (β = -.378). IRT also predicted greater self-efficacy about nightmares (β = .366), which in turn predicts sleep quality (β = -.412). However, self-efficacy was not a significant mediator of IRT's effectiveness on insomnia and sleep quality. Although IRT did increase patients' self-efficacy over dreams and nightmares, self-efficacy may not be a primary mechanism of action explaining IRT's effectiveness.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment