Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Insights from the “Dream Book” of the Babylonian Talmud [200–500 ce]

Milton Kramer

Sleep and Vigilance August 25, 2017 DOI: 10.1007/s41782-017-0012-y (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The Talmudic 'Dream Book' treats dreams as prophetic and future-oriented, contrasting with Freud's past-oriented, childhood-focused view. Dream meaning arises from interpretation, not the text itself, and is over-determined, with word play used by both Rabbis and modern interpreters. The dream experience reflects the dreamer's psychology, and dreams of ordinary people are included alongside those of royalty. Good and bad dreams mirror the dreamer's moral nature; bad dreams can be prevented from fulfillment, and unrecalled dreams can be addressed through daily prayers. Concerns about false interpreters are noted, and sexual dreams are represented symbolically. Many modern dream concepts have precursors in this work.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Dream Meaning existential Talmud Psychoanalysis Psychology
Key finding Argues that the “Dream Book” anticipates modern dream theories by presenting dreams as over-determined, reflective of the dreamer's psychology, and subject to interpretation through word play, while contrasting Talmudic prophetic dreams with Freudian childhood-oriented dreams.

Abstract

The “Dream Book” provides a subjectively extensive and humane approach to understanding dreams. The Talmudic dream is prophetic in nature so it is future oriented while the Freudian dream is past oriented toward childhood. In addition, there is the need to understand the dream experience. Dream meaning is not in the text but in the interpretation. The dream experience is over-determined. Word play is used by the Rabbis and modern interpreters. The Rabbis felt the dream experience reflected the psychology of the dreamer. Dreams of everyday men and women are presented, not just dreams of royalty. Good and bad dreams reflect the moral nature of the dreamer. And if it is a bad dream there is a method to prevent its fulfillment. Further, if one does not recall a dream, there is also a method for dealing with it in the daily prayers and asking the Lord to make it a good dream. Concern about false dream interpreters is expressed. Dreams with a sexual meaning are represented symbolically. Precursors of many of our modern views of dreaming are present in the “Dream Book”.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment