Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Measuring Counterintuitiveness in Supernatural Agent Dream Imagery

Andreas Nordin, Pär Bjälkebring

Frontiers in Psychology August 9, 2019 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01728 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Counterintuitiveness theory, which holds that concepts violating basic cognitive categories are especially memorable and likely to be treated as religious, is tested on religious dream imagery. The article adopts a fractionated approach focusing on supernatural agent (SA) cognitions as building blocks of purportedly religious dreaming. It maps contemporary theorizing about counterintuitiveness onto empirical data, exploring the pervasiveness of cognitive counterintuitiveness in dreams, testing Barrett's counterintuitiveness coding scheme for intercoder reliability, and examining base rate frequencies of counterintuitiveness in dream reports. The work aims to contribute methodology and cross-cultural base rates for future research on religious dream cognition.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Dream Mental image Cognitive psychology Psychoanalysis Psychotherapist
Citations 10
Key finding Argues that supernatural agent cognitions, characterized by counterintuitiveness, are pivotal building blocks of purportedly religious dream imagery, and that assessing intercoder reliability of Barrett's counterintuitiveness coding scheme can help establish cross-cultural base rates of counterintuitiveness in dreams.

Abstract

The present article tests counterintuitiveness theory and methodology in relation to religious dream imagery using data on religious dream content. The endeavor adopts a "fractionated" or "piecemeal" approach where supernatural agent (SA) cognition is held to be a pivotal building block of purportedly religious dreaming. Such supernaturalistic conceptualizations manifest in a cognitive environment of dream simulation processes, threat detection, and violation of basic conceptual categorization characterized by counterintuitiveness. By addressing SA cognitions as constituents of allegedly religious dream imagery, additional theorizing and supporting data are presented in a growing body of research in the cognitive science of religion (e.g., Barrett et al., 2009;Hornbeck and Barrett, 2013;Barrett, 2017) and on religious dreaming (McNamara and Bulkeley, 2015;McNamara, 2016). The aim of the article is partly to map and align contemporary theorizing regarding counterintuitiveness and CI schemes with empirical qualification of the prosaic hypothesis about the predominance of supernaturalism in allegedly religious dreaming. This is done by (1) exploring the crucial topic of the pervasiveness of cognitive counterintuitiveness; (2) testing Barrett's counterintuitiveness coding and quantifying scheme (CI scheme) for counterintuitiveness in the context of religious dreaming by assessing intercoder reliability; and (3) exploring the prevalence and base rate frequency of counterintuitiveness in dream reports. This undertaking aims to contribute to the methodology and understanding of religious dream cognition, as well as to establish the cross-cultural base rates of counterintuitiveness in dreams for future research.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment