Transpersonal psychology and the Spiritual but Not Religious movement
Jorge N. Ferrer, Will Vickery
Being Spiritual but Not Religious May 30, 2018 DOI: 10.4324/9781315107431-14 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the participatory second wave of transpersonal psychology emerged as a corrective to the spiritual narcissism of the first perennialist wave, and that the SBNR movement could reduce sectarianism by aligning with this participatory approach, though fully avoiding spiritual narcissism may be impossible. |
Abstract
This chapter explores some central lessons the Spiritual but Not Religious (SBNR) movement can learn from the evolution of the field of transpersonal psychology. The chapter focuses on the challenge of spiritual narcissism , understood as deep-seated belief in the universal superiority of one’s favored spiritual choice, path, or account of ultimate reality. Two major conceptual frameworks fueling spiritual narcissism in the SBNR Movement are identified: experientialism and perennialism. After a brief introduction to transpersonal psychology, the chapter discusses two waves of transpersonalism (perennialist and participatory), arguing that the participatory second wave emerged as a corrective to the religious sectarianism and spiritual narcissism of the first perennialist wave. Realigning the SBNR movement with the participatory approach in transpersonal psychology may thus assist the movement’s minimization of sectarianism and support a fuller embodiment of its anti-exclusivist ethos. The chapter concludes with some general reflections on the (im)possibility of fully avoiding sectarian spiritual narcissism in intellectual discourse.