Skip to content

Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports

Simon Kempe, Anna-Julia Krome, Werner Köpp, Lutz Wittmann

Somnologie - Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin August 4, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Case study Case report Peer reviewed
Sample size 1
Population A patient with impairments in personality functioning
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Dream Content measure theory Coding social sciences Affect linguistics Personality Statistics Psychotherapist Communication
Citations 2
Key findings The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System and the Zurich Dream Process Coding System differ substantially in theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course, and economic considerations, with the HVCCS being more economical and the ZDPCS allowing detailed dynamic reconstruction.

Abstract

Abstract Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming.

Objective: The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning.

Results: The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot.

Conclusion: Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy.