Skip to content

Human Consciousness: Where Is It From and What Is It for.

Boris Kotchoubey

Frontiers in Psychology April 23, 2018 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00567 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Virtual reality Communication Awareness Objectivity Play Tool use Embodiment
Key points Argues that consciousness is a kind of behavior emerging from the interaction of communication, play, and tool use, built on anticipatory behavioral control shared with other complex animals, and that this combination is unique in humans. The author proposes this framework is anti-reductionist and anti-eliminativist while treating consciousness as a purely natural biological phenomenon, and claims it accounts for typical features of consciousness such as objectivity, seriality, limited resources, explicit memory, and the feeling of agency.

Abstract

Consciousness is not a process in the brain but a kind of behavior that, of course, is controlled by the brain like any other behavior. Human consciousness emerges on the interface between three components of animal behavior: communication, play, and the use of tools. These three components interact on the basis of anticipatory behavioral control, which is common for all complex forms of animal life. All three do not exclusively distinguish our close relatives, i.e., primates, but are broadly presented among various species of mammals, birds, and even cephalopods; however, their particular combination in humans is unique. The interaction between communication and play yields symbolic games, most importantly language; the interaction between symbols and tools results in human praxis. Taken together, this gives rise to a mechanism that allows a creature, instead of performing controlling actions overtly, to play forward the corresponding behavioral options in a "second reality" of objectively (by means of tools) grounded symbolic systems. The theory possesses the following properties: (1) It is anti-reductionist and anti-eliminativist, and yet, human consciousness is considered as a purely natural (biological) phenomenon. (2) It avoids epiphenomenalism and indicates in which conditions human consciousness has evolutionary advantages, and in which it may even be disadvantageous. (3) It allows to easily explain the most typical features of consciousness, such as objectivity, seriality and limited resources, the relationship between consciousness and explicit memory, the feeling of conscious agency, etc.

Citations in the library