Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

The theoretical review of lucid dreaming research

Jianhongjing Ou

Theoretical and Natural Science November 13, 2023 DOI: 10.54254/2753-8818/8/20240371 (opens in new tab)

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Lucid dreaming, a state where the dreamer knows they are dreaming, has been studied since Frederick van Eeden's early writings, with Stephen LaBerge later bringing it into scientific research. Advances in brain imaging have revealed neural processes underlying dreams and waking. This review synthesizes research milestones, neurobiological insights, and practical applications, finding therapeutic potential for anxiety and personal growth. Challenges include experimental reliability and limited methods, and the field lacks diversity among researchers and participants, calling for broader perspectives.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Literature review Peer reviewed
Key finding Lucid dreaming has therapeutic potential to address anxiety and promote personal growth.

Abstract

Lucid dreaming, a rare state in which the dreamer realizes that he or she is dreaming, has captured the interest of scholars and sparked extensive research. This article explores the historical trajectory of lucid dreaming research, tracing its roots to the early writings of Frederick van Eeden and highlighting the key scientific contributions of Stephen LaBerge. Through a rigorous methodology, LaBerge pushed lucid dream research into the scientific realm. Technological advances, particularly in brain imaging, have deepened our understanding of the neural processes behind dreams and waking. Using a literature review approach, this article synthesizes research milestones, neurobiological insights, and practical applications of lucid dreaming. The therapeutic potential to address anxiety and promote personal growth emerged as a remarkable result. However, challenges including experimental reliability and limited research methods have surfaced. This paper also recognizes the lack of diversity among researchers and participants in the field and advocates for a broader range of perspectives and voices.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment