Embracing metaphysics in transpersonal psychology: A response to Steve Taylor
Transpersonal Psychology Review 2022 DOI: 10.53841/bpstran.2022.24.1.56 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that Jorge Ferrer's participatory theory offers a more productive approach than 'soft perennialism' for understanding metaphysics and spiritual experience. |
Abstract
Steve Taylor’s Review of the new edition of my book Shadow, Self, Spirit (2021) focuses on a critique of what he sees as my ‘sceptical’ stance on metaphysics and my rejection of his own ‘soft perennialism’. I respond to Taylor’s criticisms by noting: (1) that my own perspective rejects materialism and acknowledges the need for metaphysical concepts in transpersonal psychology; and (2) that, in researching transpersonal phenomena, researchers should aim to bracket metaphysical assumptions and should prefer non-metaphysical explanations where these are sufficient. I expand upon and clarify my criticisms of soft perennialism and argue that Jorge Ferrer’s participatory theory offers a more productive approach to understanding metaphysics, the varieties of spiritual experience, and religious pluralism.
Citations in the library
Cites 7
- Shadow, Self, Spirit: Essays in Transpersonal Psychology Transpersonal Psychology Review 2021
- Transpersonal Psychology as a Scientific Field International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2002
- From Philosophy to Phenomenology: The Argument for a “Soft” Perennialism International Journal of Transpersonal Studies July 1, 2016
- Circular Reasoning Is Not the Uroboros: Rejecting Perennialism as a Psychological Theory International Journal of Transpersonal Studies September 1, 2017
- Zombie Perennialism: An Intelligent Design for Psychology? A Further Response to Taylor's Soft Perennialism International Journal of Transpersonal Studies September 1, 2017
and 2 more in the library