The epistemological status of Transpersonal Psychology – the database argument revisited
Transpersonal Psychology Review 2007 DOI: 10.53841/bpstran.2007.11.1.99 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Proposes that transpersonal psychology develop a pragmatic catalogue of criteria for judging inner experiences, moving from subjective to intersubjective experience. |
Abstract
Transpersonal psychologists often subscribe to what I call here a Naïve Objectivism of Introspective Data (NOISED) approach to inner experience. This has been criticised. I propose here to take introspective data seriously, but not naively so. Trying to hold the middle-ground, it is argued that similar to science proper, a future transpersonal methodology will have to make an important step from subjective and inner experience to potentially intersubjective experience. While there is a canon of methods how this can be done in science with experience of the outer world, there is no equivalent in transpersonal psychology for inner experience. Simply taking experience as data won’t do. The only chance is to use pragmatic criteria and develop a pragmatic catalogue of how to judge inner experiences. This is a future task for transpersonal epistemology. It will have to use some circular structure, linking experience to tradition und probing it by pragmatic criteria. How this can be done, and why it should be done is developed in this paper.