Skip to content

Efficacy of a web application as a self-help intervention for nightmares: a randomized controlled trial

Julia Voss, Madlen Peters, Gordon Pipa, Katharina Lüth

Somnologie: Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin April 30, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s11818-026-00550-w (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 42
Population People with recurrent nightmares (at least every 2 weeks)
Duration 8-week intervention
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Randomized controlled trial Intervention counseling Distress Cognitive behavioral therapy Intention-to-treat analysis Clinical trial Psychological intervention Physical therapy Clinical psychology
Key findings DreamMend significantly reduced nightmare frequency and distress compared to a waitlist control over 8 weeks.

Abstract

Abstract Background Approximately 5% of people suffer from nightmares at least every 2 weeks. One cognitive behavioral intervention for recurrent nightmares is imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT), in which individuals recall, modify, and rehearse a less distressing version of their dream.

Objective: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of a web application called “DreamMend” as a self-help method for reducing nightmares and their associated burden. It delivers digital IRT via an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot. Materials and methods A total of 42 participants were randomized to the intervention ( n = 18) or control group ( n = 24). The intervention group received access to DreamMend for 8 weeks. Analyses were conducted in 34 participants with available outcome data (intervention: n = 16; control: n = 18).

Results: Nightmare frequency in the intervention group decreased over the course of 8 weeks, while it remained constant in the control group. Linear mixed models (LMMs) revealed a statistically significant time × group interaction, showing that the intervention group profits from the intervention. Nightmare distress decreased in both groups over the 8 weeks. The LMMs revealed a significant time × group interaction, indicating that the intervention group experienced a significantly more marked decrease in distress.

Conclusion: The DreamMend web-based application significantly reduced nightmare frequency, distress, and overall nightmare burden compared with a waitlist control, even with variable adherence and minimal intervention exposure. These findings demonstrate that AI-supported digital IRT is a feasible and effective self-help intervention. Larger, more diverse trials are needed to confirm efficacy and examine long-term outcomes.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Efficacy of a Cognitive‐Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia and Nightmares in Afghanistan and Iraq Veterans With PTSD Combat veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom and/or Operation Iraqi Freedom (mean age... 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 40
Lucid Dreaming Treatment for Nightmares: A Pilot Study Chronic nightmare sufferers 2006 Randomized controlled trial n = 23
Testing the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in lucid dreaming: A tDCS study Participants spending three consecutive nights in a sleep laboratory 2013 Randomized controlled trial n = 19
Pre-sleep treatment with galantamine stimulates lucid dreaming: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study Adults with high dream recall and an interest in lucid dreaming 2018 Randomized crossover trial n = 121
Studies with lucid dreaming as add-on therapy to Gestalt therapy Adults with nightmares (ICD-10: F51.5) at least twice a week 2015 Randomized controlled trial n = 32

Citations in the library

Explore topics