Skip to content

A Proposal Extending the Free Energy Principle

Jiazheng Liu

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) May 4, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20017222 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Narrative Class philosophy Feature linguistics Generative grammar Representation politics Energy signal processing Cognitive architecture Empirical research Cognitive psychology Cognitive science Generative model Human–computer interaction Artificial intelligence Epistemology Personality Cognition Phase matter Key lock Sketch
Key points Proposes that the Interaction Architecture Internalization Model (IAIM) accounts for why 93% of individuals with AI-associated nightmares fixated on the interaction interface, and that the Formal Priority Law predicts off-line cognition reproduces formal-structural elements preferentially.

Abstract

A survey of AI-related dreams (Mayer, 2025) reports that 93% of individuals who experienced AI-associated nightmares fixated on the interaction interface itself rather than on narrative content. We propose an Interaction Architecture Internalization Model (IAIM) to account for this finding and for a broader class of phenomena spanning language acquisition, cultural meme propagation, and personality formation. The model is grounded in, and extends, the Free Energy Principle (FEP; Friston et al., 2006): while the FEP's perceptual-learning pathway (optimisation of slow synaptic parameters μₕ) already encodes structural regularities of the environment, we argue that temporal delay is the specific, hitherto under-exploited statistical feature that drives internalisation of interaction architecture. We formalise this via the Learning Time Delay Dose D = Σᵢ[wᵢ(Δtᵢ - Δt꜀)] and show that once D crosses an individual-specific critical threshold Θ꜀, a precision-weighted phase transition occurs in which the external interaction architecture becomes a stable prior in the agent's generative model. A key empirical implication—the Formal Priority Law (FPL)—is that off-line cognition reproduces the formal-structural elements of a repeatedly experienced architecture preferentially over its narrative-semantic content. This prediction is now supported by six independent sources, including the first polysomnographically verified, real-time-signalled lucid-dreaming study of a VR interaction architecture (Morris et al., 2025). The proposal draws on Piaget's constructivist internalisation, Chomsky's architectural nativism, Wiener's cybernetics, and Landau-Hale phase-transition mathematics, all interpreted within the FEP variational framework.