Unveiling the EEG signatures of extrasensory perception during spiritual experiences: A single-case study with a well-renowned channeler.
D Del Rosario-Gilabert, I Vigué-Guix
Explore (New York, N.Y.) January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2025.103114 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA single-case study examined a channeler with 30 years of experience who claims to connect with non-corporeal intelligences. EEG results ruled out fraud and mental pathology as explanations for the experience, but the authors concluded that more information was needed to determine whether extrasensory perception was involved. The approach may help design future rigorous protocols for studying mediumship and channeling, potentially contributing to a better understanding of the brain during spiritual experiences.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Single case study Case report Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1 |
| Population | A well-known channeler with nearly three decades of experience connecting with non-corporeal intelligences |
| Keywords | Channeling EEG Extrasensory perception Mediumship Mental states |
| Key finding | EEG results rejected the fraud hypothesis and the mental pathology hypothesis, but more information was needed to conclude the extrasensory perception hypothesis. |
Abstract
Just as the brain of Albert Einstein is studied in an attempt to understand human intelligence or the bodies of elite athletes are examined to improve muscle strength, the study of people who claim to have spiritual experiences could enrich the investigation of the brain-mind relationship. Although mediumship with deceased people is widely extensively studied in spiritual experiences, we explored a mediumistic experience called "channeling" where the individual connects with a non-corporeal intelligence (NCI) source. To approach this kind of spiritual experience, we considered three hypotheses: the fraud hypothesis (i), the mental pathology hypothesis (ii), and the extrasensory perception hypothesis (iii). In this single case study, the participant was a well-known channeler with nearly three decades of experience connecting with NCIs. Given the EEG results, we rejected the fraud hypothesis, rejected the mental pathology hypothesis, and felt we needed more information to conclude the extrasensory perception hypothesis. The approach of the present single-case study may help researchers design follow-up rigorous protocols for mediumship and channeling studies, which could contribute to a better understanding of the brain during spiritual experiences.