Skip to content

Ketamine as a mental health treatment: Are acute psychoactive effects associated with outcomes? A systematic review.

Meryem Grabski, Anna Borissova, Beth Marsh, Celia J. A. Morgan, Helen Valerie Curran

Behavioural Brain Research August 17, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112629 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 891
Population Adults with a psychiatric diagnosis (depression, substance use disorders, social anxiety disorder)
Topics Ketamine Mystical experience Esketamine
Keywords Dissociative effects Mental health Psychedelic effects Psychotomimetic effects
Key findings The CADSS total is not consistently associated with antidepressant outcomes, and the current literature is too limited to draw definite conclusions on the association between acute psychoactive effects and mental health outcomes.

Abstract

Esketamine was recently licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Drug Agency (EDA) for use in treatment resistant depression (TRD), and further research indicates ketamine as a possible treatment in other mental health conditions. While the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, it has been hypothesised that ketamine's acute psychoactive effects may be associated with psychiatric treatment efficacy. We systematically reviewed the evidence for this association. The databases Medline, Embase and PsychInfo were searched up to June 2019. Studies were included if they enrolled adults with a psychiatric diagnosis, assessed acute psychoactive effects using a quantitative measure, and reported on the relationship between acute effects and treatment outcome. We included 21 studies, involving 891 patients. Seventeen studies assessed patients with depression (TRD [k = 14]), three assessed substance use disorders, and one assessed social anxiety disorder. Overall, 41 associations were assessed, of which 26 % were significant. The studies reviewed displayed great variability in terms of methodology and quality of reporting. The most commonly assessed effect was dissociation, measured by the CADSS. Our results suggest that the CADSS total is not consistently associated with antidepressant outcomes. Apart from this, the current literature is too limited to draw definite conclusions on the presence of an association between acute psychoactive effects and mental health outcomes. The field would benefit from consistently employing a priori hypotheses, more transparent reporting and sufficiently powered statistical analyses. Furthermore, the use of a broader range of assessments tools of acute psychoactive effects during ketamine administration would be beneficial.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on ketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
The effect of a single dose of intravenous ketamine on suicidal ideation: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis Depressed patients with suicidal ideation at baseline 2017 Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis n = 167
Ketamine use: a review Ketamine users 2011 Systematic review
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ketamine and postoperative pain – a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials Surgical patients from 25 countries 2004 Systematic review n = 2,839
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 46

and 41 more in the library

Cites 42

and 37 more in the library

Explore topics