Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Maps of subjective feelings.

Lauri Nummenmaa, Riitta Hari, Jari K Hietanen, Enrico Glerean

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America September 11, 2018 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807390115 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Subjective feelings—ranging from emotions and thoughts to bodily sensations and illnesses—can be mapped in a structured space. Over 1,000 participants rated 100 feelings on basic dimensions, judged their similarity, and drew where on the body each feeling was sensed. Neural similarity data from nearly 10,000 brain-imaging studies were also used. All feelings were emotionally valenced, and the intensity of bodily sensations matched the intensity of mental experiences. Five clusters emerged: positive emotions, negative emotions, cognitive processes, somatic states and illnesses, and homeostatic states. The feeling space was best explained by emotional valence, mental experiences, and bodily sensations, showing that feelings are categorical, emotional, and embodied.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,026
Population Participants in online surveys
Keywords Consciousness Emotion Feeling Interoception Somatosensation
Key finding Subjective feelings form five clusters—positive emotions, negative emotions, cognitive processes, somatic states and illnesses, and homeostatic states—and are organized by emotional valence, mental experiences, and bodily sensations.

Abstract

Subjective feelings are a central feature of human life. We defined the organization and determinants of a feeling space involving 100 core feelings that ranged from cognitive and affective processes to somatic sensations and common illnesses. The feeling space was determined by a combination of basic dimension rating, similarity mapping, bodily sensation mapping, and neuroimaging meta-analysis. A total of 1,026 participants took part in online surveys where we assessed (i) for each feeling, the intensity of four hypothesized basic dimensions (mental experience, bodily sensation, emotion, and controllability), (ii) subjectively experienced similarity of the 100 feelings, and (iii) topography of bodily sensations associated with each feeling. Neural similarity between a subset of the feeling states was derived from the NeuroSynth meta-analysis database based on the data from 9,821 brain-imaging studies. All feelings were emotionally valenced and the saliency of bodily sensations correlated with the saliency of mental experiences associated with each feeling. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction revealed five feeling clusters: positive emotions, negative emotions, cognitive processes, somatic states and illnesses, and homeostatic states. Organization of the feeling space was best explained by basic dimensions of emotional valence, mental experiences, and bodily sensations. Subjectively felt similarity of feelings was associated with basic feeling dimensions and the topography of the corresponding bodily sensations. These findings reveal a map of subjective feelings that are categorical, emotional, and embodied.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment