Measures of Well-being Parameters in Gayatri Mantra Practitioners, Yoga Practitioners, and Nonpractitioners: A Cross-sectional Survey Study in India
Nitesh Sharma, J. Kumar, Rahul Garg, Rohit Pandey, U. Sharma, Dushyant Soni
Ancient Science of Life July 1, 2024 DOI: 10.4103/asl.asl_59_24 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAdults who regularly practice Gayatri Mantra and yoga report higher well-being than those who practice only yoga, who in turn report higher well-being than nonpractitioners. A cross-sectional survey of 1,135 adults compared practitioners of Gayatri Mantra with yoga, yoga-only practitioners, and nonpractitioners. Gayatri Mantra with yoga practitioners scored significantly higher on peace of mind, general well-being, life satisfaction, and resilience than yoga-only practitioners, who scored higher than nonpractitioners on all measures except resilience. Longer duration of practice was positively associated with well-being.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1,135 |
| Population | Adults (mean age 34.26, standard deviation 13.14) |
| Interventions | Gayatri Mantra Yoga |
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Key finding | Gayatri Mantra with yoga practitioners had significantly higher well-being measures than yoga-only practitioners and nonpractitioners. |
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of mental health problems and declining well-being among individuals is a growing concern. Among the methods prescribed for mental well-being, meditation, and yoga practices have been at the forefront since ancient times. This paper presents a cross-sectional survey study aimed at understanding the effect of Gayatri Mantra (GM) and yoga practices on the well-being indicators of practitioners compared with nonpractitioners. A cross-sectional survey study using convenience sampling was conducted, involving 1135 adults (age mean = 34.26 and standard deviation = 13.14) in the study. The participants were grouped as Gayatri mantra with yoga practitioners (GMY), yoga practitioners (YP), and nonpractitioners (NP) based on their daily routine practices they followed. GMY and YP were further sub-grouped based on the duration of practice viz: Long-term, mid-term, and short-term practitioners. The Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the Mann–Whitney test, indicated that GMY and YP had higher well-being measures on the scales of Peace of Mind Scale, Scale of General Well-being, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Brief Resilience Scale than NP (all P < 0.01). Further, it was found that GMY had significantly higher well-being measures than YP (P < 0.01) on all scales, and YP had significantly higher well-being scores than NP (P < 0.01) on all scales except resilience. In addition, it was also found that the duration of GM and yoga practices in years was positively associated with well-being measures. Altogether, the findings from the study reveal that practices of GM and yoga help promote the mental well-being of the individuals essential for living a healthy life. In addition, the findings also suggested that incorporating GM practices alongside yoga yields a more pronounced positive impact on overall well-being than yoga practices alone. The study also revealed that the long-term practice of GM and yoga leads toward better well-being, peace of mind, satisfaction in life, and resilience.