Beyond Consciousness Hacking: Positioning the Nzila Spirit-Tech Paradigm within the Emerging Global Spirit-Tech Landscape
Figshare June 29, 2026 DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.32825264.v1 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA new framework called the Nzila Spirit-Tech Paradigm proposes that indigenous knowledge systems, spiritual intelligence, ecological wisdom, and humanity's relationship with nature should inform the design principles of future technologies, rather than asking how technology can enhance spirituality. The paper presents four foundational pillars, outlines an interdisciplinary research agenda, and proposes an expanded framework for evaluating technological progress based on harmony, responsibility, ecological integrity, cultural continuity, and long-term human flourishing.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Flourishing Consciousness Spirituality Indigenous Contemplation |
| Key finding | Proposes that indigenous knowledge systems, spiritual intelligence, ecological wisdom, and humanity's relationship with nature can inform the design principles of future technologies, rather than technology merely enhancing spirituality. |
Abstract
The rapid emergence of Spirit-Tech has created new opportunities for exploring relationships between spirituality and technology. Existing approaches largely investigate how contemporary technologies may facilitate meditation, contemplative practice, consciousness exploration, and spiritual well-being. This paper introduces the Nzila Spirit-Tech Paradigm as a complementary and distinct framework. Rather than asking how technology can enhance spirituality, the Paradigm asks whether indigenous knowledge systems, spiritual intelligence, ecological wisdom, and humanity's relationship with nature can inform the design principles of future technologies themselves. The paper positions the Paradigm within the emerging global Spirit-Tech landscape, presents its four foundational pillars, outlines an interdisciplinary research agenda, and proposes an expanded framework for evaluating technological progress based on harmony, responsibility, ecological integrity, cultural continuity, and long-term human flourishing