Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Testing the Pagan Prescription: Using a Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate Pagan Spell-Casting as a Form of Noncontact Healing.

Charmaine Sonnex, Chris A Roe, Elizabeth C Roxburgh

Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) March 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0279 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A randomized controlled trial examined whether modern Pagan spell-casting produces measurable healing effects. Forty-four participants were randomly assigned to receive the intervention either early or later. All participants wrote requests, provided a photograph and personal item, and attended weekly guided body-scan meditations before completing the WHOQOL-BREF quality-of-life measure. General health improved significantly across all participants from weeks 1 to 4, and physical and psychological domains also improved. However, there were no significant differences between the groups that received the spell-casting intervention at different times, indicating that the improvements cannot be attributed to the spells themselves.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Double-blind Peer reviewed
Sample size 44
Population Adults recruited via snowball sampling in the United Kingdom
Intervention Pagan spell-casting
Duration 4 weeks
Keywords Neopaganism Whoqol-bref Distance healing Noncontact healing Randomized controlled trial
Key finding All participants showed improvements in health and well-being, but the spell-casting intervention did not produce group differences, so the improvements were not due to the spells.

Abstract

Objectives: This research investigates the healing practices of modern Paganism using a randomized controlled trial. Paganism is a burgeoning belief system in the United Kingdom, within which healing is a key aspect. However, Pagan spell-casting practices have received little attention from distance healing researchers. This study aims to address this gap in the literature. Design: This study utilized a randomized, double-blind, delayed intervention design. Settings/Location: Research took place at the University of Northampton. Subjects: Forty-four participants (30 females, 14 males) were recruited using snowball sampling (mean age = 24.30; range = 18-55). Procedure: Participants were randomly allocated to either Group A or B. Participants made written requests to the practitioner about changes they would like to see in their lives and provided a photograph and personal item to be used during the intervention. Participants attended meetings once a week during which they would take part in a guided body scan meditation before completing a quality-of-life measure. Healing practices were conducted for Group A between weeks 1 and 2 and for Group B between weeks 2 and 3. Outcome Measure: Well-being was measured using the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed a significant, positive change in general health from weeks 1 to 4 (F = 4.02, p = 0.025, η2 = 0.149). Separate analysis of variances of the four WHOQOL domains showed significant improvements across the study in the physical and psychologic domains only; there was no significant group difference on any of the outcomes. Conclusion: All participants showed an increase in health and well-being domains directly related to their spell requests. However, there are no group differences to suggest that the spell-casting intervention was responsible.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment