Measuring mindfulness in children: breath counting is unrelated to self-reported mindfulness but improves after mindfulness practice in 9–13 year-olds
Winnie Zhuang, Laura Michaelson, Sona Dimidjian, Yuko Munakata
Frontiers in Psychology September 30, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1644127 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA breath counting task can serve as a valid behavioral measure of mindfulness in children aged 9–13 years, capturing aspects of mindfulness distinct from those measured by self-report questionnaires. In a sample of 109 children, breath counting showed psychometric properties similar to those of adults and was positively associated with cognitive control performance, but unrelated to self-reported mindfulness. Among 67 children who completed 1–2 weeks of daily audio-based mindfulness exercises, breath counting improved significantly, whereas self-reported mindfulness did not. The findings indicate that behavioral measures like breath counting may be more sensitive to training impacts than self-reports, and both types of measures are recommended for future research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort with a subset receiving a pre-post intervention Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 109 |
| Population | Children ages 9–13 years |
| Interventions | audio-based mindfulness training daily breathing exercises |
| Duration | 1–2 weeks of daily mindfulness exercises |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Task project management Cognition Psychometrics Breathing |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | Breath counting improved following 1–2 weeks of daily mindfulness exercises in children, while self-reported mindfulness did not. |
Abstract
Recent calls for mindfulness measures beyond self-report abound, especially for children. Because breath awareness is central to many mindfulness practices, the breath counting task has been proposed as a behavioral measure of mindfulness for adults. In the current study, we investigated whether the breath counting task can also serve as a valid behavioral measure of children’s mindfulness. We examined psychometric properties across breath counting, three established mindfulness questionnaires, and a behavioral cognitive control measure in a sample of 109 children ages 9–13 years. We also offered 1–2 weeks of audio-based mindfulness training to a subset of children ( n = 67) who completed daily breathing exercises, then reassessed their breath counting and self-reported mindfulness. In the full sample, children’s breath counting showed psychometric properties and patterns similar to those of adults, was positively associated with overall cognitive control performance, but was unrelated to their self-reported mindfulness ( p ’s > 0.24). However, breath counting did improve following training amongst the subset of children who completed 1–2 weeks of daily mindfulness exercises ( p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.23), whereas self-reported mindfulness did not ( p = 0.44). Our findings suggest that the breath counting task captures aspects of mindfulness separate from those measured by children’s self-reports, and may be more sensitive to training impacts. We recommend the use of both self-report and behavioral measures of mindfulness, like the breath counting task, in future work.