Predictors and moderators of biopsychological social stress responses following brief self-compassion meditation training.
Joanna J Arch, Lauren N Landy, Kirk Warren Brown
Psychoneuroendocrinology July 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.03.009 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractBrief self-compassion meditation training dampens sympathetic and subjective anxiety responses to a social stress test. How well it works depends on certain baseline personality traits. People with lower non-attachment and higher social anxiety benefited less from the training, while those with lower social anxiety and lower non-attachment showed greater stress reduction. Trait self-compassion itself did not predict or moderate the training's effect. The findings highlight the importance of considering individual psychological traits in predicting responses to social evaluative threat, especially in the context of resiliency training.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study with baseline trait measurement and moderation analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Brief self-compassion meditation training |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Alpha-amylase Self-compassion Social anxiety Social evaluative threat |
| Key finding | Trait non-attachment, rumination, and social anxiety moderated the effects of self-compassion meditation training on stress responses, but trait self-compassion did not. |
Abstract
Arch et al. (2014) demonstrated that brief self-compassion meditation training (SCT) dampened sympathetic (salivary alpha-amylase) and subjective anxiety responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), relative to attention and no-instruction control conditions. The present study examined baseline predictors and moderators of these SCT intervention effects. Baseline characteristics included two stress vulnerability traits (social anxiety and rumination) and two potential resiliency traits (non-attachment and self-compassion). We investigated how these traits moderated the effects of SCT on response to the TSST, relative to the control conditions. We also tested how these individual differences predicted TSST responses across conditions in order to uncover characteristics that confer increased vulnerability and resiliency to social stressors. Trait non-attachment, rumination (for sympathetic TSST response only), and social anxiety (for subjective TSST response only) interacted with training condition to moderate TSST responses such that following SCT, lower attachment and lower social anxiety predicted lower TSST stress responses, relative to those scoring higher on these traits. In contrast, trait self-compassion neither moderated nor predicted responses to the TSST. Thus, although SCT had robust effects on buffering stress across individuals with varying levels of trait self-compassion, other psychological traits enhanced or dampened the effect of SCT on TSST responses. These findings support the importance of examining the role of relevant baseline psychological traits to predict sympathetic and subjective responses to social evaluative threat, particularly in the context of resiliency training.