Comparative study on the status of mental well-being among regularly meditating and non-meditating health care personnel in Sri Lanka
Wasantha Gunathunga, Oshadi Jayakody, Larrissa Bartlett, Ishanka Munugoda, Champa Kumudini Gunathunga
Journal of the College of Community Physicians April 27, 2022 DOI: 10.4038/jccpsl.v25i3.8206 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractHealth care personnel who meditated regularly had higher mental well-being and lower depression than non-meditators six months after a structured Vipassana-informed mindfulness meditation program. The study compared 60 health care workers from a primarily Buddhist population using the Primary Mental Health Questionnaire and the CES-D depression scale. Regular meditators scored significantly better on both measures. The findings suggest that this simple, low-cost meditation approach may help improve mental well-being among health care professionals.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Descriptive comparative study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 60 |
| Population | Health care personnel from a primarily Buddhist population |
| Duration | Six months from the first training session |
| Key finding | Regular meditators showed higher mental well-being and lower depression than non-meditators six months after a structured Vipassana-informed mindfulness meditation program. |
Abstract
Abstract Background and objectives Meditation holds potential for reducing occupation related stress. However, the current evidence base is largely limited to studies from the western countries with insufficient assessment of performance outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in the levels of mental well-being and depression between regularly meditating and non-meditating health care personnel from a primarily Buddhist population. Methods This study was a descriptive comparative study designed to determine the status of mental well-being and depression among health care workers (n=60), exploring the moderating effect of having participated in a structured Vipassana informed mindfulness mediation programme. Data was collected six months from the first training session. Mental well-being and depression were assessed using Primary Mental Health Questionnaire (PMHQ) and Centre for Epidemiological Studies- Depression scale (CES-D) respectively. Independent sample T- Test and Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test were performed to determine the differences in 1) the status of metal well- being and 2) the level of depression between regular meditators and non-meditators. Results Regular meditators showed higher levels of mental well-being compared to non-meditators, indicated by a significant difference in PMHQ values (p=0.001) and significantly lower depression levels according to the CES-D scores (p<0.01). Conclusion Our findings suggest that Vipassana informed mindfulness mediation may have profound practical implications in improving mental well-being among health care professionals. This method with its simple and low-cost approach needs to be tested in other professional groups, to increase the generalizability and applicability.