Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

A semi-randomised control trial assessing psychophysiological effects of breathwork and cold immersion.

Nadia Fox, Hannah Biddell, Jemma King

Scientific Reports December 12, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-29187-9 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Acute intentional stress—cyclic hyperventilation followed by cold exposure (the Wim Hof Method, WHM)—improves momentary feelings of energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress more than mindfulness meditation does. Over 29 days, WHM's benefits grew cumulatively while meditation's faded, suggesting dose-dependent effects. However, few lasting trait changes occurred between groups. Executive function, physiology, and sleep showed subtle differences. The findings indicate that short-term stress protocols can enhance certain psychological states, but longer-term trait shifts may require more time.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Semi-randomised controlled trial Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 404
Population Healthy adults (226 females, 177 males, 1 other; mean age 37)
Intervention mindfulness meditation
Duration 29-day intervention
Keywords Allostatic load Cold exposure Cyclic breathing Executive function Hormesis
Key finding The Wim Hof Method produced greater momentary improvements in energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress than mindfulness meditation, with cumulative benefits over 29 days.

Abstract

The paradoxical nature of stress lies in its ability to both enhance and hinder psychological, physiological, and cognitive functioning. While chronic stress impairs functioning, acute stress can enhance resilience, cognition, and performance. We examined whether intentional short-term stress induced by cyclic hyperventilation and cold exposure (the Wim Hof Method (WHM)) improves psychophysiological and cognitive outcomes compared to an active control (mindfulness meditation). In this semi-randomised controlled trial, healthy adults (N = 404; 226 females, 177 males, 1 other; mean age = 37) completed one of three 29-day interventions: WHM in-person, WHM-remote, or meditation. Measures included physiological and sleep biometrics, executive function tests, and psychometric event sampling surveys (state and trait change). WHM conditions showed greater momentary improvements in self-reported energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress following daily protocol compared with meditation. Although WHM protocols initially resulted in smaller reductions in self-reported state stress, their impact increased across days on protocol, while the impact of meditation decreased. A similar time-condition interaction was also observed for energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress, suggesting cumulative, dose-dependent benefits. While minimal significant between-condition trait changes emerged over 29-days, state interaction patterns suggest potential for longer-term state-trait shifts. Executive function, physiological, and sleep results showed nuanced between-condition differences.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment