Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Assessing effects of vibroacoustic stimulation compared to a guided mindfulness meditation using the biosignal of human speech.

Charlotte Fooks, Oliver Niebuhr

Frontiers in network physiology January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2026.1677209 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

An exploratory pilot study tested whether speech prosody can serve as a biosignal to measure stress reduction. Thirty participants were split into three groups: guided mindfulness meditation, a vibroacoustic intervention, or a control. Each read a text aloud before and after a single 20-minute session. Acoustic-prosodic analysis of the sixty readings showed that both intervention groups spoke with a breathier vocal quality in the second reading, indicating relaxation, while the control group's speech became tenser and less variable in loudness. The findings suggest that speech prosody is a sensitive biomarker for classifying treatment effects and evaluating relaxation outcomes.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Exploratory pilot study Peer reviewed
Sample size 30
Population Participants divided into three treatment groups
Interventions guided mindfulness meditation vibroacoustic intervention
Duration One 20-minute treatment
Topics Meditation
Keywords Biosignal Network physiology Speech prosody
Key finding Speech prosody is a sensitive biomarker for treatment-effect classification and evaluation, with intervention groups showing breathier vocal quality and control group showing tenser speech.

Abstract

High stress and low wellbeing pose severe individual, societal and economic threats, and there is a pressing demand for non-invasive stress reduction tools. This exploratory pilot study assessed the efficacy of speech prosody as a biosignal for stress elicitation, when comparing relaxation outcomes of two interventions with a control group. Thirty participants were divided into three treatment groups; (1) guided mindfulness meditation (2) vibroacoustic intervention (3) control. All participants read aloud a text before and after one 20-min treatment. The sixty readings were assessed using a multi-parametric acoustic-prosodic analysis, and within-speaker differences were compared between the initial and final reading. Results show groups (1) and (2) spoke with a breathier vocal quality in the second reading, while group (3) speech was tenser and at a lower, less variable loudness. Results demonstrate speech prosody is a sensitive biomarker for treatment-effect classification and evaluation. Practical limitations and future research perspectives are discussed.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment