Subjective Perceptions of South Korean Meditation Teachers on Meditation Teaching Competencies in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Myoung Jin Hong, Song Yi Lee
Religions February 25, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/rel17030286 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Q methodology Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 21 |
| Population | Certified meditation teachers in South Korea |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Attunement Discernment Contemplation Embodied cognition Competence human resources Perception Mindfulness meditation Coaching Reflexivity Creativity Metacognition Pedagogy |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | Meditation teaching competence is perceived as a "way of being" rooted in ethical self-awareness, relational presence, and embodied practice, rather than technical skills or digital literacy. |
Abstract
This study investigates how South Korean meditation teachers conceptualize core professional competencies in digitally delivered and AI-mediated contemplative contexts, addressing a gap in prior research that has emphasized effectiveness and technological scalability over teachers’ own understandings of authority and professionalism. Using Q methodology, the study identified shared subjective meaning structures among 21 certified meditation teachers in South Korea. From 133 competency-related statements derived from academic literature and practitioner sources, a 33-item Q sample was developed and analyzed through by-person factor analysis. The analysis revealed four distinct perception types of meditation teaching competencies: 1. Embodied Practice-Grounded, prioritizing the depth of personal meditative practice; 2. Relational Presence-Grounded, emphasizing intersubjective attunement between teacher and practitioner; 3. Pedagogical Judgment-Grounded, focusing on the strategic integration of theory and coaching practice; and 4. Ethical Self-Reflection-Grounded, centering on ongoing moral reflexivity and inner examination. The findings indicate that, in the face of AI-driven automation, meditation teaching competence is perceived not as a set of technical skills or digital literacy, but as a “way of being” rooted in the triadic integration of ethical self-awareness, relational presence, and embodied practice. Furthermore, the study suggests that in AI-mediated contemplative environments, professional competence in AI-mediated contemplative environments is defined less by technological adoption than by ethical discernment and responsibility for non-delegable aspects of guidance, advancing a practitioner-centered account of spiritual authority in the era of artificial intelligence.
Citations in the library
Cites 8
- Mechanisms of mindfulness Journal of Clinical Psychology December 29, 2005
- What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft Psychological Medicine December 29, 2016
- What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective Contemporary Buddhism May 1, 2011
- The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists PLoS One May 24, 2017
- Outstanding Challenges in Scientific Research on Mindfulness and Meditation Perspectives on Psychological Science October 10, 2017
and 3 more in the library