Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Title: What Must Be Preserved? Mapping Theories of Consciousness to Engineering Requirements for Mind Preservation

Thomas A. Ryan

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) April 1, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19374628 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Integrated information theory Artificial consciousness Schema genetic algorithms Rational analysis Cognitive science
Citations 8
Key points Argues that the eight major theories of consciousness diverge dramatically on engineering requirements for preservation, yet converge on three necessary conditions; biological preservation (cryonics) is the only strategy compatible with all eight theories.

Abstract

The engineering of consciousness preservation (whether through whole-brain emulation, cryonic revival, or brain-computer interfaces) proceeds largely without reference to theories of consciousness. This is a remarkable omission. The choice of what must be preserved in a brain depends entirely on what generates consciousness, and the major theories disagree on this question by many orders of magnitude in their engineering implications. I evaluate eight major theories of consciousness (Integrated Information Theory (IIT 4.0), Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), Higher-Order Thought theory (HOT), Predictive Processing / Free Energy Principle, Recurrent Processing Theory (RPT), Biological Computationalism, Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR), and Attention Schema Theory (AST)) against nine preservation-relevant criteria, and derive specific engineering requirements from each theory's core postulates. The theories split 4-3-1 on substrate independence. Required information content ranges from approximately 1-10 TB under AST to physically impossible under Orch OR. Required compute spans from 10^15 FLOPS to formally uncomputable. Despite these disagreements, all eight theories converge on three requirements: temporal dynamics must be preserved, integration across components is necessary, and feedforward-only architectures are ruled out. Cross-theory risk analysis reveals that biological preservation (cryonics with future revival) is the only strategy compatible with all eight theories, while gradual bio-hybrid replacement is the strongest non-cryonic option (compatible with 7 of 8). I identify a "deflation paradox": theories most favorable to preservation deflate consciousness to a functional property, while theories that take phenomenal experience most seriously make preservation hardest or impossible. The primary bottleneck for consciousness preservation is not engineering but theory.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment