Skip to content

Updated Expectations are Needed for Masked Priming Experiments: Commentary on Tsikandilakis et al. (2025).

Gary D Fisk

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science March 25, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-026-09993-0 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Affective primacy hypothesis Cognitive unconscious Consciousness Emotion Masked priming Masking Standard hypothesis Unconscious perception
Key points Argues that the null awareness paradigm in unconscious perception research relies on oversimplistic models, and that both methodological improvements and updated theoretical expectations are needed to advance the field.

Abstract

Masking priming research into unconscious perception has a long history of ambiguous findings and controversies. Tsikandilakis and colleagues (2025) offer several commendable methodology recommendations that might resolve ambiguities and lead to compelling findings. However, better methodology might be insufficient to fully address the weaknesses of the null awareness paradigm. The expected experimental outcomes originate from decades-old models of perception and consciousness that are oversimplistic and obsolete. A re-orientation is needed. Given that perception, cognition, and emotion are the products of network functions, we should expect that perception and consciousness will have a graded continuum, dependent relationship for near-threshold stimuli. Methodology improvements are welcome, but updated expectations for experimental outcomes will also be needed to advance unconscious perception research.

Citations in the library

Explore topics