Frequency-tagging as a measure of conscious face perception.
Audrey Mazancieux, Axel Cleeremans, Adélaïde De Heering
Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2026.03.014 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractSteady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) recorded during frequency-tagging can track both objective and subjective conscious perception of faces. In 32 participants viewing image sequences at 6 Hz with faces every fifth image, presented at either 1% or 1.5% contrast, the face-related brain signal at 1.5% contrast was higher during correct gender categorisation than incorrect categorisation and increased linearly with both visibility and confidence ratings. At 1% contrast, no face perception occurred behaviourally, and no brain response to faces was detected. Attention, monitored via a fixation-cross task, related more closely to confidence than visibility. These findings indicate SSVEPs can serve as a marker of conscious perception.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 32 |
| Population | Human participants |
| Keywords | Consciousness Faces Frequency-tagging Metacognition Visibility |
| Key finding | SSVEPs from frequency-tagging can track both objective and subjective conscious perception of faces at 1.5% contrast. |
Abstract
Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) from frequency-tagging (FT) paradigms are widely used to investigate visual processing. Yet their association to conscious perception remains unclear. To test whether SSVEP occurs during conscious perception or without consciousness, 32 participants saw sequences of different images presented at 6 Hz (6 images per second) and containing faces every fifth image (1.2 Hz). All images were presented at either 1% contrast or 1.5% contrast. After each sequence, participants had to categorise the face gender (objective perception) and rate their confidence in this categorisation and the visibility of the faces (subjective perception). During the sequence presentation, participants' attention was monitored via an orthogonal fixation-cross task. Results showed that, at 1.5% contrast, the face signal was higher during correct than during incorrect gender categorisation and increased linearly with both visibility and confidence ratings. In line with participants' performance on the fixation-cross task, the signal collected at 6 Hz also indicated that attention related more closely to confidence than to visibility. At 1% contrast however, no face perception occurred behaviourally, which was confirmed by the absence of brain signal recorded in response to face instances. Overall these findings show that SSVEPs can track both the objective and subjective perception of faces at a conscious contrast (1.5%). These findings bring new evidence that SSVEPs can be used as a marker of conscious perception.