Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Is Dialogue with a Technosubject Possible? Architectures of Artificial Intelligence and Signatures of Consciousness

Arseniy V. Nedyak

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences June 15, 2025 DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2025-68-3-93-113 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Consciousness may be characterized by functional signatures such as a global workspace, recurrent processing, metacognitive monitoring, predictive processing, and high-level information integration. Current AI systems exhibit some of these properties but in a fragmented, poorly integrated manner. Emerging hybrid neurosymbolic architectures, neuroevolutionary approaches, and embodied robotics are moving toward systems that more closely approximate conscious cognitive functions. However, genuine dialogue with a potentially conscious technosubject would require intersubjectivity, empathy, mutual ethical responsibility, and lived bodily and social experience—or functional analogues—that go beyond mere simulation. The near-term possibility of artificial general intelligence (AGI) demands proactive discussion of the technosubject's normative status and development of ethical principles and regulatory mechanisms.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Computer science Philosophy
Key finding Argues that while AI systems exhibit some functional signatures of consciousness, genuine dialogue with a potentially conscious technosubject requires intersubjectivity, empathy, and lived experience beyond simulation, necessitating proactive ethical and regulatory discussion.

Abstract

The article explores the phenomenon of consciousness through the lens of advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and of contemporary neurobiological theories, each offering a distinct account of the architecture of conscious processing. This theoretical landscape allows us to identify several specific properties – such as a global workspace, recurrent processing, metacognitive monitoring, predictive processing, and high-level information integration – as functional signatures of cognitive processes inherent to biological consciousness. While certain AI systems exhibit some of these properties, they currently manifest in a fragmented and poorly integrated manner. The transition toward hybrid, particularly neurosymbolic, architectures, coupled with the expanding use of neuroevolutionary and embodied approaches in robotics, is laying the groundwork for integrated systems that more closely approximate conscious cognitive functions. However, the necessary conditions for a genuine dialogue between humans and a potentially conscious technosubject – including elements of intersubjectivity, empathy, mutual ethical responsibility, and lived bodily and social experience, or at least functional analogues thereof – suggest that the capacity for such interaction transcends the mere simulation of functional properties. The potential emergence of artificial general intelligence (AGI) in the near future, an entity capable not only of performing all human cognitive functions but also of demonstrating autonomous behavior and engaging in genuine dialogue, necessitates a proactive discussion of the technosubject’s normative status (the bounds of agency and responsibility, rights, duties, and safeguards for humans), along with the development of appropriate ethical principles and regulatory mechanisms.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment