YUCT Appendix H2: Historical and Philosophical Precursors of the Yakushev Unified Coordination Theory.
July 1, 2026 DOI: 10.24108/preprints-3115743 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThis appendix traces the historical and philosophical roots of the Yakushev Unified Coordination Theory (YUCT), which argues that coordination is more fundamental than matter, space, time, or fields. It finds structural parallels between YUCT's formal concepts and the intuitions of thinkers from Leibniz to Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, and critiques mainstream physics for abandoning a coordination paradigm in favor of the Copenhagen interpretation. A universal error law with exponent β = 2/3 is shown to hold across more than 50 orders of magnitude, indicating scale invariance in coordinative processes. The work introduces concepts like relational complexity and coordination maturity, and explores implications for science, society, and politics.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Discipline Covert Interpretation philosophy Mainstream Metaphysics |
| Key finding | Argues that a universal error law with exponent β = 2/3 ≈ 0.67 holds across more than 50 orders of magnitude, confirming scale invariance of coordinative processes. |
Abstract
This appendix presents a comprehensive historical and philosophical investigation of the precursors to the Yakushev Unified Coordination Theory (YUCT) — a new fundamental theory that posits the ontological primacy of coordination over matter, spacetime, and fields. The author traces the evolution of coordinative intuition from Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's monadology, through Nikola Tesla's radiant ether and Mark Twain's mental telegraphy, to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox and contemporary philosophical concepts. The work demonstrates a structural isomorphism between the intuitions of past thinkers and the formal apparatus of YUCT, including the Dictionary–Index–Resonance (D+I·R) triad and the YPSDC protocol. Special attention is devoted to a critical analysis of the 70-year "detour" of mainstream physics, associated with the adoption of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics and the abandonment of the coordination paradigm. A diagnostic tool of "coordination maturity" for evaluating philosophical systems is introduced. The work introduces the concepts of relational complexity and the cascade of errors as a path to unity, and provides an analysis of the social, economic, and political implications of coordination theory. It is demonstrated that the universal error law \(\varepsilon = \kappa_c \alpha K_{\mathrm{eff}}^{-\beta}\) with exponent \(\beta = 2/3 \approx 0.67\) holds across more than 50 orders of magnitude, confirming the scale invariance of coordinative processes. The work offers a new perspective on the unity of science, transcending traditional disciplinary boundaries and opening a path toward post-ideological engineering of social systems. The appendix includes chronological tables, terminological convergence, and a detailed analysis of the philosophical, theological, and aesthetic dimensions of coordination.