Skip to content

Nitrous oxide for the treatment of psychiatric disorders: A systematic review of the clinical trial landscape.

Helen Liu, Jaimie Kerzner, Ilya Demchenko, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Sidney H. Kennedy, Karim S Ladha, Venkat Bhat

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica August 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13432 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed
Topics Depression
Keywords Clinical trial Nitrous oxide Psychiatric disorders Systematic review
Key findings Preliminary studies support the feasibility of administering N2O for depression, but appropriate blinding is a critical challenge and larger-scale RCTs are needed.

Abstract

To systematically review published research studies and ongoing clinical trials investigating nitrous oxide (N2 O) in psychiatric disorders, providing an up-to-date snapshot of the clinical research landscape. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies published until June 2021 using the OVID databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo) and the clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP). In total, five relevant published articles were identified, among which four investigated N2 O for depression. One single-dose randomized controlled trial (RCT) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), one triple crossover RCT comparing 50% vs. 25% N2 O for TRD, and one repeated-dose RCT for major depressive disorder (MDD) suggest that N2 O has preliminary feasibility with rapid-acting effects on symptoms of depression. From the public registries, 10 relevant ongoing clinical trials were identified. They aim to explore the use of N2 O for MDD, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and suicidal ideation. To date, the typical treatment protocol parameters were a single session of 50% N2 O delivered for 60 min, although the concentration of 25% is also being explored. Projected enrolment numbers for ongoing trials (M = 55.0) were much higher than sample sizes for published studies (M = 13.0), suggesting that there potentially will be more large-scale RCTs published in the next few years. Preliminary studies support the feasibility of administering N2 O for depression; however, appropriate blinding is a critical challenge. Larger-scale RCTs with repeated doses of N2 O and follow-up times beyond 1 month are needed to confirm the feasibility, therapeutic efficacy, and sustainability of response.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Cited by 15

and 10 more in the library

Cites 10

and 5 more in the library

Explore topics