Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers
Rocío Martín‐Santos, José Alexandre S. Crippa, Albert Batalla, Sagnik Bhattacharyya, Zerrin Atakan, Stefan Borgwardt, Paul Allen, Marc L. Seal, Klaus Langohr, Magı́ Farré, AW. Zuardi, Philip Mcguire
Current Pharmaceutical Design September 12, 2012 DOI: 10.2174/138161212802884780 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Randomized controlled trial Placebo-controlled Double-blind Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 16 |
| Population | Healthy male subjects |
| Interventions | THC CBD |
| Dose | THC 10 mg, CBD 600 mg |
| Duration | 3 hours post drug administration |
| Topics | Cannabis CBD |
| Keywords | Placebo Sedation Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol Oral administration Anesthesia Analysis of variance Pharmacology Cannabinoid |
| Citations | 288 |
| Key findings | THC produced anxiety, dysphoria, positive psychotic symptoms, sedation, subjective intoxication, and increased heart rate, while CBD showed no differences from placebo on any measure. |
Abstract
Rationale: Animal and humans studies suggest that the two main constituents of cannabis sativa, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have quite different acute effects. However, to date the two compounds have largely been studied separately.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the acute pharmacological effects of both THC and CBD in the same human volunteers.
Methods: A randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo controlled trial was conducted in 16 healthy male subjects. Oral THC 10 mg or CBD 600 mg or placebo was administered in three consecutive sessions, at one-month interval. Physiological measures and symptom ratings were assessed before, and at 1, 2 and 3 hours post drug administration. The area under the curve (AUC) between baseline and 3 hours, and the maximum absolute change from baseline at 2 hours were analysed by one-way repeated measures analysis of variance, with drug condition (THC or CBD or placebo) as the factor.
Results: Relative to both placebo and CBD, administration of THC was associated with anxiety, dysphoria, positive psychotic symptoms, physical and mental sedation, subjective intoxication (AUC and effect at 2 hours: p < 0.01), an increase in heart rate (p < 0.05). There were no differences between CBD and placebo on any symptomatic, physiological variable.
Conclusions: In healthy volunteers, THC has marked acute behavioural and physiological effects, whereas CBD has proven to be safe and well tolerated.
In the evidence
This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.
-
State of the evidence: CBD No effect
CBD 600 mg produced no differences from placebo on any symptomatic or physiological measure, while THC produced anxiety, dysphoria, psychotic symptoms, sedation, and increased heart rate.
Synthesized
Comparable studies
Other randomized controlled trials on CBD, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants | 2012 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 48 |
| Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... | 2009 | Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial | n = 15 |
| Inverted U-Shaped Dose-Response Curve of the Anxiolytic Effect of Cannabidiol during Public Speaking in Real Life Healthy subjects aged 18 to 35 years | 2017 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 60 |
| Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... | 2009 | Randomized controlled trial | n = 15 |
| Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Healthy volunteers with a history of light cannabis use | 2019 | Randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover | n = 14 |
Citations in the library
Cited by 45
- Translational Investigation of the Therapeutic Potential of Cannabidiol (CBD): Toward a New Age Frontiers in Immunology September 21, 2018
- Gone to Pot – A Review of the Association between Cannabis and Psychosis Frontiers in Psychiatry May 22, 2014
- Inverted U-Shaped Dose-Response Curve of the Anxiolytic Effect of Cannabidiol during Public Speaking in Real Life Frontiers in Pharmacology May 11, 2017
- Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Psychopharmacology May 1, 2019
- Legal highs: staying on top of the flood of novel psychoactive substances Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology January 26, 2015
and 40 more in the library
Cites 17
- Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Archives of General Psychiatry 2009
- Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, as an antipsychotic drug Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research April 1, 2006
- Assessment of Driving Capability Through the Use of Clinical and Psychomotor Tests in Relation to Blood Cannabinoids Levels Following Oral Administration of 20 mg Dronabinol or of a Cannabis Decoction Made with 20 or 60 mg Δ9-THC* Journal of Analytical Toxicology July 1, 2005
- The safety of modafinil in combination with oral ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior March 2011
- Subjective and physiological effects after controlled Sativex and oral THC administration. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics March 2011
and 12 more in the library