The British Empire's Fear and Fascination with the Occult
Social science review archives. May 24, 2026 DOI: 10.70670/sra.v4i2.2179 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe British Empire's engagement with the occult was a structural feature of imperial governance, not a peripheral curiosity. Occult belief was simultaneously legitimized and suppressed along lines of race, class, and gender: elite esotericism in Britain was protected under scientific and artistic frameworks, while working-class practitioners faced legal persecution. In the colonies, indigenous spiritual systems were criminalized as seditious or dismissed as irrational superstition, even as British audiences consumed their aesthetics from a distance. Decisions about whose spiritual knowledge counted as truth were themselves acts of power.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Occult Indigenous Elite Corporate governance Post colonialism |
| Key finding | Argues that the British Empire's engagement with the occult operated as a structural feature of imperial governance, with occult belief simultaneously legitimized and suppressed along lines of race, class, and gender. |
Abstract
This paper examines how the British Empire's engagement with the occult operated as a structural feature of imperial governance rather than a peripheral curiosity. By comparing metropolitan and colonial contexts, it traces how occult belief was simultaneously legitimized and suppressed along lines of race, class, and gender. At home, elite esotericism found protection under scientific and artistic frameworks, while working-class practitioners faced legal persecution. In the colonies, indigenous spiritual systems were criminalized as seditious or dismissed as irrational superstition, even as British audiences consumed their aesthetics from a safe distance. Drawing on legal history, cultural analysis, postcolonial theory, and primary sources including Victorian occult periodicals, parliamentary records, and colonial ordinances, this paper argues that decisions about whose spiritual knowledge counted as truth were themselves acts of power.