Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Evaluation of potential punishing effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) in rhesus monkeys responding under a choice procedure.

David R Maguire

Behavioural Pharmacology October 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0000000000000787 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A 5-HT2A receptor agonist called DOM, tested in four rhesus monkeys using a choice procedure, showed neither rewarding nor punishing effects. When monkeys chose between a sucrose pellet alone or a pellet plus an intravenous infusion, fentanyl increased choice for the infusion (rewarding), while histamine decreased it (punishing). DOM, tested across doses of 3.2 to 100 µg/kg/infusion, did not systematically alter choice, whether given before or after histamine. This suggests DOM lacks both positive reinforcing and aversive properties under conditions sensitive to these effects.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Within-subjects experimental study Peer reviewed
Sample size 4
Population Rhesus monkeys
Interventions 2 5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) fentanyl histamine
Dose 3.2-100 µg/kg/infusion for DOM and histamine; 0.1-3.2 µg/kg/infusion for fentanyl
Citations 2
Key finding The 5-HT2A receptor agonist DOM had neither positive reinforcing nor punishing effects in a choice procedure with rhesus monkeys.

Abstract

There has been substantial and growing interest in the therapeutic utility of drugs acting at serotonin 2A subtype (5-HT 2A ) receptors, increasing the need for characterization of potential beneficial and adverse effects of such compounds. Although numerous studies have evaluated the possible rewarding and reinforcing effects of 5-HT 2A receptor agonists, there have been relatively few studies on potential aversive effects. The current study investigated punishing effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM) in four rhesus monkeys responding under a choice procedure in which responding on one lever delivered a sucrose pellet alone and responding on the other lever delivered a sucrose pellet plus an intravenous infusion of a range of doses of fentanyl (0.1-3.2 µg/kg/infusion), histamine (3.2-100 µg/kg/infusion), or DOM (3.2-100 µg/kg/infusion). When fentanyl was available, responding for a pellet plus an infusion increased dose dependently in all subjects, indicating a positive reinforcing effect of fentanyl. When histamine was available, responding for a pellet plus an infusion decreased in three of four subjects, indicating a punishing effect of histamine. Whether available before or after histamine, DOM did not systematically alter choice across the range of doses tested. These results suggest that the 5-HT 2A receptor agonist DOM has neither positive reinforcing nor punishing effects under a choice procedure that is sensitive to both processes.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment