Skip to content

The post-marketing safety of Esketamine among older adults(≥ 65): an real-world pharmacovigilance study.

Bin Deng, Zhiwen Fu, Linjie Li, Yusen Xu, Zihe Yang, Xuejia Zhai, Yongning Lv

BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology August 29, 2025 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-025-00992-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 4,102
Population Adults (under 65 years) and older adults (65 years and older) with esketamine-related adverse event reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Intervention Esketamine
Topics Esketamine
Keywords Adverse events Faers Older adults Real-world data analysis
Citations 3
Key points Older adults treated with esketamine have a higher risk of severe psychiatric adverse events (dissociation, suicidal ideation, depression, anxiety) and general adverse events compared to younger adults.

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to investigate the safety profile of Esketamine, with a particular focus on comparing adverse events (AEs) between adults (< 65 years) and older adults (≥ 65 years) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of FAERS data from 2019 to 2024, identifying 6,452 Esketamine-related AE reports. After removing data without age information, these reports were categorized into two age groups: 536 from older adults and 3,566 from younger adults. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated to determine the relative risk of specific AEs in each age group.

Results: At system Organ Class (SOC)level, the Esketamine-related AEs of both adults group and older adults group were seen in 17 organ systems. The analysis revealed significant differences in AE profiles of psychiatric disorders between the two age groups. Older adults had a higher incidence of dissociation, suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety, compared to younger adults. Additionally, older adults reported more general and administration site conditions, suggesting a greater susceptibility to systemic and local reactions. Gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders were less frequent in older adults, but their potential impact remains critical.

Conclusions: The findings highlight a higher risk of severe psychiatric and general AEs in older adults treated with Esketamine, necessitating careful patient selection, monitoring, and tailored treatment protocols.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics