Skip to content

Caution Is Warranted in Prescribing Ketamine for Mental Health.

Katherine Drabiak

Journal of General Internal Medicine April 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-10024-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Esketamine Ketamine
Citations 2
Key findings Telehealth services prescribing off-label racemic ketamine account for about half the ketamine market, and providers should evaluate evidence, risk-benefit, and patient best interests when considering off-label prescribing.

Abstract

Clinics across the USA advertise ketamine as an alternative solution for mental health conditions. Ketamine has expanded into a multibillion-dollar industry, with three delivery models: (1) in-person clinics offering off-label racemic ketamine; (2) clinic visits for esketamine (Spravato); and (3) telehealth services prescribing off-label racemic ketamine. About half of the market encompasses telehealth using off-label prescribing. This article describes the legal changes behind the growth of telehealth-only providers, differences in patient monitoring requirements, and implications for patient safety. While providers can legally prescribe medications off-label, providers should consider three questions to determine whether off-label prescribing is clinically and ethically appropriate. Providers should evaluate: (1) whether sound evidence exists to prescribe; (2) whether drug benefits outweigh the risks; (3) and whether prescribing serves the patient's best interests. As a dissociative anesthetic, ketamine raises significant concerns regarding whether the purpose and function of the drug meet legal requirements for appropriate prescribing of controlled substances.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on ketamine, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics