Skip to content

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RACEMIC KETAMINE AND ESKETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Anees Bahji, Carlos A. Zarate, Gustavo Vazquez

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety March 9, 2022 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2047928 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,903
Population Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression
Interventions Racemic ketamine Esketamine
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Citations 71
Key findings Ketamine and esketamine improved response, remission, and depression severity compared to placebo, with no significant differences in safety or acceptability.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Racemic ketamine and esketamine have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects. We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of racemic and esketamine for depression. Research design and methods We conducted a PRISMA-guided review for relevant randomized controlled trials of racemic or esketamine for unipolar or bipolar major depression from database inception through 2021. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses using pooled rate ratios (RRs) and Cohen’s standardized mean differences (d) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: We found 36 studies (2903 participants, 57% female, 45.1 +/- 7.0 years). Nine trials used esketamine, while the rest used racemic ketamine. The overall study quality was high. Treatment with any form of ketamine was associated with improved response (RR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.72-2.66; I2=65%), remission (RR=1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.02; I2=39%), and depression severity (d=-0.63; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.45; I2=78%) against placebo. Overall, there was no association between treatment with any form of ketamine and retention in treatment (RR=1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; I2<1%), dropouts due to adverse events (RR=1.56; 95% CI, 1.00-2.45; I2<1%), or the overall number of adverse events reported per participant (OR=2.14; 95% CI, 0.82-5.60; I2=62%) against placebo.

Conclusions: Ketamine and esketamine are effective, safe, and acceptable treatments for individuals living with depression.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Participants in randomized controlled trials of ketamine for suicidal ideation 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 197
Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder Patients with major depressive disorder who are treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 774
Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder 2025 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Efficacy of intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine with dose escalation for Major depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2024 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 12

Explore topics

By condition and practice