EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RACEMIC KETAMINE AND ESKETAMINE FOR DEPRESSION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Anees Bahji, Carlos A. Zarate, Gustavo Vazquez
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety March 9, 2022 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2047928 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 2,903 |
| Population | Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression |
| Interventions | Racemic ketamine Esketamine |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine Ketamine |
| Citations | 71 |
| Key findings | Ketamine and esketamine improved response, remission, and depression severity compared to placebo, with no significant differences in safety or acceptability. |
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Racemic ketamine and esketamine have demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects. We aimed to review the efficacy and safety of racemic and esketamine for depression. Research design and methods We conducted a PRISMA-guided review for relevant randomized controlled trials of racemic or esketamine for unipolar or bipolar major depression from database inception through 2021. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses using pooled rate ratios (RRs) and Cohen’s standardized mean differences (d) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: We found 36 studies (2903 participants, 57% female, 45.1 +/- 7.0 years). Nine trials used esketamine, while the rest used racemic ketamine. The overall study quality was high. Treatment with any form of ketamine was associated with improved response (RR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.72-2.66; I2=65%), remission (RR=1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.02; I2=39%), and depression severity (d=-0.63; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.45; I2=78%) against placebo. Overall, there was no association between treatment with any form of ketamine and retention in treatment (RR=1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; I2<1%), dropouts due to adverse events (RR=1.56; 95% CI, 1.00-2.45; I2<1%), or the overall number of adverse events reported per participant (OR=2.14; 95% CI, 0.82-5.60; I2=62%) against placebo.
Conclusions: Ketamine and esketamine are effective, safe, and acceptable treatments for individuals living with depression.
Comparable studies
Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on esketamine for depression, most cited first.
Citations in the library
Cited by 44
- History repeating: guidelines to address common problems in psychedelic science Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology 2023
- Esketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry March 1, 2025
- Ketamine and the neurobiology of depression: Toward next-generation rapid-acting antidepressant treatments Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences November 27, 2023
- Patient perspectives and experiences with psilocybin treatment for treatment-resistant depression: a qualitative study Scientific Reports February 5, 2024
- History repeating: A roadmap to address common problems in psychedelic science March 10, 2023
and 39 more in the library
Cites 69
- A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression Archives of General Psychiatry August 1, 2006
- NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites Nature April 24, 2016
- Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms Pharmacological Reviews June 26, 2018
- Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial American Journal of Psychiatry August 28, 2013
- Mechanisms of Ketamine Action as an Antidepressant Molecular Psychiatry March 13, 2018
and 64 more in the library