The Costs and Health Benefits of Expanded Access to MDMA-assisted Therapy for Chronic and Severe PTSD in the USA: A Modeling Study
Anton L. V. Avanceña, J. Kahn, Elliot Marseille
Clinical drug investigation March 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01122-0 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Decision-analytic model Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Eligible US patients with chronic and severe PTSD |
| Duration | 10-year coverage targets |
| Topics | MDMA PTSD |
| Citations | 19 |
| Key points | Expanding MDMA-AT to 25–75% of eligible patients is projected to be cost-saving compared to standard of care, averting tens of thousands of deaths and gaining millions of quality-adjusted life years. |
Abstract
Intensive psychotherapy assisted with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA-AT) was shown in Phase 3 clinical trials to substantially reduce post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms compared to psychotherapy with placebo. This study estimates potential costs, health benefits, and net savings of expanding access to MDMA-AT to eligible US patients with chronic and severe PTSD. Using a decision-analytic model, we compared the costs, deaths averted, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained of three, 10-year MDMA-AT coverage targets (25%, 50%, and 75%) compared to providing standard of care to the same number of eligible patients with chronic and severe PTSD. We used a payer perspective and discounted costs (in US$) and QALYs to 2020. We conducted one-way, scenario, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and calculated the net monetary value of MDMA-AT using a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Expanding access to MDMA-AT to 25–75% of eligible patients is projected to avert 43,618–106,932 deaths and gain 3.3–8.2 million QALYs. All three treatment targets are dominant or cost-saving compared to standard of care. Our sensitivity analyses found that accounting for parameter uncertainty and changes in various assumptions did not alter the main finding—MDMA-AT is dominant compared to standard of care. Expanding access to MDMA-AT to patients with chronic and severe PTSD will provide substantial health and financial benefits. The precise magnitude is uncertain and will depend on the number of eligible patients and other inputs.
Citations in the library
Cited by 15
- Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-art Review. Current Neuropharmacology 2024
- The Psychedelic Future of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Treatment Current Neuropharmacology January 5, 2024
- The economics of psychedelic-assisted therapies: A research agenda Frontiers in Psychiatry December 5, 2022
- Group psychedelic therapy: empirical estimates of cost-savings and improved access Frontiers in Psychiatry December 6, 2023
- Psychedelics for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: Interpreting and Translating Available Evidence and Guidance for Future Research. American Journal of Psychiatry 2025
and 10 more in the library
Cites 6
- MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Nature Medicine June 1, 2021
- Durability of improvement in post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and absence of harmful effects or drug dependency after 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted psychotherapy: a prospective long-term follow-up study. Journal of Psychopharmacology 2013
- MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD: study design and rationale for phase 3 trials based on pooled analysis of six phase 2 randomized controlled trials. Psychopharmacology September 1, 2019
- Breakthrough for Trauma Treatment: Safety and Efficacy of MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy Compared to Paroxetine and Sertraline Frontiers in Psychiatry September 12, 2019
- The cost-effectiveness of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD PLoS One October 14, 2020
and 1 more in the library