The Scheduling
The History of MDMA June 29, 2023 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198867364.003.0008 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | Argues that despite a DEA administrative law judge's conclusion that MDMA should be placed into Schedule III, the DEA overruled this decision and placed MDMA permanently into Schedule I in 1986. |
Abstract
Abstract After becoming aware of its broader distribution, the DEA announced the possible scheduling of MDMA in 1984. Physicians using MDMA for therapy demanded hearings with respect to the proposed scheduling of MDMA. The DEA was astonished to hear about the therapeutic use of MDMA but nonetheless insisted that it represented a danger to public health and had to be scheduled. Hearings were held in three major cities in the United States in front of a DEA administrative law judge who studied the case and heard witnesses from the DEA and the physicians opposing the scheduling with regard to the five standard questions about the safety and medical use of MDMA, its abuse potential, and possible neurotoxicity. After collecting evidence on the five issues, the DEA judge concluded that MDMA should not be placed into Schedule I, but into Schedule III instead. Nevertheless, the DEA overruled the decision of its own judge and placed MDMA permanently into Schedule I in 1986. In advance of the hearings, the DEA had announced the ‘emergency scheduling’ of MDMA and (successfully) initiated an international scheduling by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, the WHO recommended allowing researchers to study ‘this interesting substance’.