Skip to content

IN Esketamine and IV Ketamine: Results of a multi-site observational study assessing the effectiveness and tolerability of two novel therapies for treatment-resistant depression.

Gilmar Gutierrez, Jennifer Swainson, Nisha Ravindran, Raymond W. Lam, Peter Giacobbe, Ganapathy Karthikeyan, Annette Kowara, André Do, Anusha Baskaran, Sean Michael Nestor, Melody J Y Kang, Aleksandar Biorac, Gustavo Vazquez

Psychiatry Research October 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116125 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 53
Population Patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder
Interventions IV ketamine IN esketamine
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Keywords Antidepressant effect Depressive symptoms Psychopharmacology Real-world clinical data Suicidal ideation Treatment response Depression treatment Ketamine therapy Clinical research Antidepressant medications Mental health interventions
Citations 17
Key findings Both IV ketamine and IN esketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation with mild, transient side effects.

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) ketamine and intranasal (IN) esketamine are novel therapies to manage treatment resistant depression within major depressive disorder (MDD-TRD). This is a multi-site observational study aiming to assess the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of these novel therapies in the management of MDD-TRD. 53 patients were referred to receive IV ketamine (n = 26, 69.23 % female, 52.81 ± 14.33 years old) or IN esketamine (n = 27, 51.85 % female, 43.93 ± 13.57 years old). Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) for depression severity and item 10 of the MADRS for suicidal ideation (SI). Tolerability was assessed by systematically tracking side effects and depersonalization using the 6-item Clinician administered dissociative symptom scale (CADSS-6). The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, risk ratio and effect size. Both IV ketamine and IN esketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation by treatment endpoint. Patients receiving IN esketamine, and patients receiving IV ketamine had a similar risk of developing side effects. All side effects reported were mild and transient. These results suggested that both IV ketamine and IN esketamine are effective in the management of depressive symptoms and were well tolerated. Therefore, the results of this study could serve to inform clinical practice.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Cited by 14

and 9 more in the library

Cites 26

and 21 more in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice