Skip to content

Embodied dynamics of creative placemaking: conceptualizing the spaces, places, and environments of creativity.

Laura H Malinin

Frontiers in Psychology 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1656337 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Conceptual analysis Peer reviewed
Keywords 4e cognition Affordance theory Behavior setting theory Creative placemaking Creative press Creative workplace Embodied creativity Enactive architecture
Citations 2
Key points No existing framework links physical environment and creative processes, but creatively productive people leverage and attribute insights to specific settings, suggesting designed environments can be a resource for creativity.

Abstract

Researchers have long called for an integrated approach toward understanding the complex relationships between factors influencing creativity. Significant efforts have been made in this area through research examining interactions between personal traits, social environments, and creative productivity. However, relationships among factors involving the physical context of creativity have less often been the focus of cross-disciplinary inquiry, due, in part, to lack of any conceptual framework connecting them. This leaves interior designers, architects, and facility planners left to rely largely on anecdotal evidence and fragmented empirical insights to inform creative placemaking efforts through their environmental designs. Recent embodied creativity approaches have argued that to advance creative process knowledge and facilitate creativity in educational and work environments, creativity must be considered a physically and socially situated practice. There is empirical evidence that professionally and historically creative people are aware that the physical environment is an important factor in their creative productivity, that they leverage and manipulate features and qualities of a setting during creative efforts, and attribute insights and productivity to specific settings. Yet there is no framework linking the physical environment and creative processes, suggesting a lack of awareness about how designed environments might be a resource for creativity. This conceptual analysis aims to bridge this gap by utilizing an embodied creativity lens, grounded in ecological psychology and 4E (embodied, embedded, enactive, extended) cognitive science, to evaluate and synthesize literature from creativity, environmental design, ecological psychology, and cognitive science towards clarifying person-environment relationships during creativity, including conceptualizations of creative space, place, and physical environments supporting creativity.