Skip to content

Beyond Local Domains: Connective Ontology in (Post-)Cognitive Sociology.

James Rupert Fletcher

Sociological research online September 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1177/13607804241237768 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Affinities Cognitivism Domain-specificity Enactivism Localisation
Citations 2
Key points Argues that cognitive sociology could fruitfully engage with post-cognitivist science, using connective ontology to conceptualize cognition as dynamically emergent ecological energies.

Abstract

Ontology in cognitive science has long been dominated by cognitivism, developing computer science metaphors to position cognition as intrinsic mind-brain information-processing. Contemporary cognitivism hypothesises localised domain-specificity, disaggregating cognition into discrete subtypes, each of which exists in a dedicated brain region. Latterly, peripheral cognitive science scholarships have contested these ideas, cultivating post-cognitivist dispositions with radical ontologies, relocating cognition in active socio-material ecologies. Nonetheless, much cognitive sociology retains cognitivist ontology, treating sociological phenomena as extrinsic constraints that influence the mind-brain's foundational cognition. I argue that cognitive sociology could fruitfully engage with post-cognitivist science. As an example, I use connective ontology, from the sociology of personal life, to conceptualise cognition as dynamically emergent and vitally animated ecological connective energies. Doing so, I show that post-cognitivism offers routes towards genuine social ontologies of cognition as a sociological matter, moving beyond cognitivism.

Citations in the library

Explore topics